Dilema Etis dan Imparsialitas Birokrasi pada Pilkada Serentak Kota Bima 2024

Rifai Rifai; Haeril Haeril

doi:10.47650/jglp.v6i2.1554

Rifai Rifai Universitas Mbojo Bima
Haeril Haeril Universitas Mbojo Bima

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v6i2.1554

Keywords: Etis, Imparsialitas, Birokrasi, Pilkada Serentak

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi fenomena tekanan politik terhadap Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) selama Pilkada Serentak 2024 di Kota Bima, dengan fokus pada dilema etis yang mengancam netralitas dan imparsialitas birokrasi. Meskipun ASN seharusnya profesional dan netral, mereka kerap terjebak dalam tekanan politik dari elite lokal, menciptakan konflik antara kepatuhan terhadap regulasi dan desakan untuk mendukung calon tertentu, yang pada akhirnya merusak kredibilitas birokrasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif, dengan data yang dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan ASN, pejabat pemerintahan, pengawas pemilu, dan pengamat politik, serta observasi partisipatif terhadap dinamika politik di Kota Bima. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa ASN sering dihadapkan pada tekanan politik signifikan, menciptakan dilema etis dan mengancam integritas birokrasi. Tekanan ini, jika diabaikan, dapat merusak netralitas ASN yang seharusnya independen. Selain itu, ancaman terhadap karier ASN yang menolak tekanan politik semakin memperparah situasi. Hasil penelitian juga mengindikasikan bahwa kurangnya pemahaman ASN terhadap regulasi netralitas semakin memperburuk kondisi, yang berdampak negatif pada kualitas pelayanan publik dan integritas demokrasi lokal. Penelitian ini diharapkan memberikan wawasan untuk reformasi birokrasi yang lebih kuat dalam mendukung pelaksanaan demokrasi yang jujur dan adil di Kota Bima.

References

Amer, N., Fahmi Lubis, A., Hidayat Muhtar, M., Jillyan Edsti Saija, V., Suciani Putri, V., & Setiawan, B. (2024). Implications of the Constitution for Political Neutrality in the Dynamics of Law and Democracy. 10(2), 283–302. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31004/cdj.v4i4.19099.

Andersen, D. (2021). Cover sheet. (September 2020).

Brans, M., Pelgrims, C., & Hoet, D. (2005). Politico-administrative relations under coalition governments: the case of Belgium. In Coalitions of the unwilling? Politicians and civil servants in coalition governments.

By, C. C. (2005). The value of the dichotomy.

Caron, D. J., & Giauque, D. (2006). Civil servant identity at the crossroads: New challenges for public administrations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(6), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610685989

Christensen, J. G., & Opstrup, N. (2018). Bureaucratic dilemmas: Civil servants between political responsiveness and normative constraints. Governance, 31(3), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12312

Cuddon, J, A. (2013). Literary Terms and Literary Theory.

Eichbaum, C., & Shaw, R. (2008). Revisiting politicization: Political advisers and public servants in westminster systems. Governance, 21(3), 337–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00403.x

Fadilah, U., & Saepudin, E. A. (2024). Profesi birokrasi hukum pemerintahan dalam etika pelayanan publik. RESJUSTITIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 253–265. Retrieved from resjustitia.lppmbinabangsa.id

Faedlulloh, D., & Duadji, N. (2019). Birokrasi dan Hoax: Studi Upaya Menjaga Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara di Era Post-Truth. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 15(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i3.566

Fernandes, A., Mellaz, A., Riza, F., Siregar, F. E., Hurriyah, Sandi, I. D. K. W. R., … Wahyu, Y. (2019). Serial Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Serentak 2019. Perihal Penyelenggaraan Kampanye, 203.

From_Political_Neutrality_to_Political_W.pdf. (n.d.).

Grube, D. C. (2017). Civil servants, political history, and the interpretation of traditions. Historical Journal, 60(1), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X15000527

Harits Anugrah, E., Lambali, S., & Nur indar, I. (2022). Bureaucracy Neutrality In The 2018 Regional Head Election In Indonesia Case Study In Makassar City. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2022(7), 4784–4790. Retrieved from http://journalppw.com

Hidayatullah, A. (2024). The Challenge of Bureaucratic Neutrality in the 2024 Legislative and Presidential Elections in Indonesia. 05(1), 135–148.

Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Politik Daerah, K., & Syarbaini, S. (2019). JIP (JURNAL ILMU PEMERINTAHAN): The Neutrality of State Civil Apparatus in Local Election: a Case Study of South Sulawesi Provincial Election in 2018 Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara dalam Pilkada : Studi Kasus Pilkada Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan Tahun 2018. Governmentjournal.Org, 4(2), 104–118. Retrieved from http://governmentjournal.org/index.php/jip

Indiahono, D. (2022). Bureaucratic Neutrality Index in Direct Regional Head Elections: Optimism in Developing Professional Bureaucracy in Indonesia. Public Policy and Administration, 21(3), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.21.3.31788

Indiahono, D., Satyawan, D. S., & Yamin, M. (2022). Understanding Sowan as a New Paternalistic Bureaucracy Pattern of Local Officials in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.201-211

Jusman Iskandar, Alfiah, Amalia Nur Fajriah, Anggun Dwi Rahmawati, & Anisa Sofiani. (2019). Etika Birokrat Dalam Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 18(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.54783/dialektika.v18i3.69

Kernaghan, K. (2000). The post-bureaucratic organization and public service values. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852300661008

Lovita, A. J., & Adnan, M. F. (2021). Implementasi Prinsip Transparansi Dan Imparsialitas Dalam Pelaksanaan Pilkada Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Kabupaten Siak, Riau. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 5(4), 1076–1085. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v5i4.2425

Lynn, L. E. (2001). The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: What traditional public administration really stood for. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00016

Monteiro, P., & Adler, P. S. (2022). Bureaucracy for the 21St Century: Clarifying and Expanding Our View of Bureaucratic Organization. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 427–475. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.0059

Nadjib, A., Bafadhal, O. M., & Santoso, A. D. (2022). Social Capital, Bureaucratic Neutrality, and Regional Head Election in Indonesia. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 87(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.7366/1509499518703

Nahtigal, L., & Haček, M. (2013). Politicization Of Senior Civil Servants In Slovenia Lea NAHTIGAL Miro HAČEK. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, (39), 108–127.

Noer, H. H. (2024). Portrait of the Politicization of Indonesian Bureaucracy in the 2024 Election. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 4(03), 752–769. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i03.735

Nurfarhati Nurfarhati, Mukhlis Ishaka, & Haeril Haeril. (2024). Etika Deontologis dan Kebajikan: Fondasi Meningkatkan Akuntabilitas Birokrasi. Public Service and Governance Journal, 5(2), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.56444/psgj.v5i2.1472

Pariangu, U. T. (2020). Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara Dan Biropatologi Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah. Journal Publicuho, 3(4), 470. https://doi.org/10.35817/jpu.v3i4.15375

Park, C. O., & Han, S. (2018). Bureaucratic responses to the cross pressures of political neutrality in relation to cultural orientation and role perception: The case of Korean civil servants. Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 33(3), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.52372/kjps33303

Pedersen, K. H., & Johannsen, L. (2016). Where and How You Sit: How Civil Servants View Citizens’ Participation. Administration and Society, 48(1), 104–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714555753

Persson, A., & Goldkuhl, G. (2010). Government value paradigms-bureaucracy, new public management, and e-government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02704

Peters, B. G., Danaeefard, H., Ahmadzahi Torshab, A., Mostafazadeh, M., & Hashemi, M. (2022). Consequences of a politicized public service system: Perspectives of politicians, public servants, and political experts. Politics and Policy, 50(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12447

Platon, M. (n.d.). ETICA ŞI ETICHETA FUNCŢIONARULUI PUBLIC ( II )*. (Ii).

Rohr, J. A. (n.d.). Civi I Servants and Their Constitutions.

Sandy, M. A. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Pilkada Serentak 2020 Di Sumatera Barat. 7(1), 255–269. Retrieved from http://scholar.unand.ac.id/463894/%0Ahttp://scholar.unand.ac.id/463894/2/TESIS BAB I FIX.pdf

Smirna, T. (2021). The New Deal was no deal. Revista Procesos De Mercado, VII, 37–88. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v7i2.272

Sossin, L. (2006). Defining Boundaries: The Constitutional Argument for Bureaucratic Independence and its Implication for the Accountability of the Public Service. Commission of Inquiry to the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities, Restoring Accountability, Research Studies, 2, 25–72.

Spiller, P. T., & Urbiztondo, S. (1994). Political appointees vs. career civil servants: A multiple principals theory of political bureaucracies. European Journal of Political Economy, 10(3), 465–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/0176-2680(94)90005-1

Staronova, K., & Rybář, M. (2021). Personal or Party Roots of Civil Service Patronage? Ministerial Change Effects on the Appointments of Top Civil Servants. Administration and Society, 53(5), 651–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720956996

Surbakti, R., & Nugroho, K. (2015). Studi Tentang Desain Kelembagaan Pemilu Yang Efektif, Kemitraan Bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan. 72–73. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/publications/45222/studi-tentang-desain-kelembagaan-pemilu-yang-efektif

Suzuki, K., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2017). Rediscovering bureaucracy. (July).

Suzuki, K., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2021). Is impartiality enough? Government impartiality and citizens’ perceptions of public service quality. Governance, 34(3), 727–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12527

Tri Haryani, A., & Sutrisno, B. H. (2022). the Importance of the Neutrality of the State Civil Apparatus As the Effort To Realize Quality Elections. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 13(10), 790–796. Retrieved from http://www.ijser.org

Tudor, V. (n.d.). Termenul rezonabil de informare a mediatorului cu privire la elementele semnificative ale cazului penal dedus medierii for mediation. 1, 41–45.

Urcan, N. Ţ. (2011). Din Republica Moldova. 8(8), 206–212.

Veit, S., & Vedder, S. (2023). Measuring civil service politicization with career data: Backstage and frontstage political experience of top civil servants in the German ministerial administration. Public Administration, (October), 1119–1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12967

Windari, T. (2021). Journal of International Women ’ s Studies. National Identity Attachment and Its Variables, 22(2021), 21–22.