Smoke-Filled Room and Secret Garden of Politics: How Do Candidate Selection As Rational Choice in Local Head of Government Election?

  • Andi Luhur Prianto
Keywords: smoke-filled room, secret garden, candidate selection, Rational choice institutionalism

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the candidate selection model in political parties, especially in the current electoral politics in Indonesia, which has not been adequately explained by previous studies. Candidate selection, distinct from political recruitment, is the process of selecting from a competitive group of candidates and frequently takes place behind closed doors, analogous to a “smoke-filled room” or a “secret garden of politics”. This practice raises issues of transparency, accountability and the dominance of party elites, who can overlook grassroots aspirations and candidate quality. This research uses a literature review method, exploring previous research and official documents to understand the concepts, practices and challenges of candidate selection. The findings show that the candidate selection mechanism often becomes an arena for internal party power struggles, far from democratic principles. This article also discusses democratic selection models based on the supply and demand perspectives of candidates and analyzes them through the lenses of new institutionalism and rational choice institutionalism. The rational choice institutionalism approach is considered relevant in explaining how individual and group interests influence the selection process. The study concludes that understanding these dynamics is important to promote a more democratic and accountable candidate selection system.

References

REFERENCES

Agrawal, A., & Goyal, S. (2001). Group Size and Collective Action. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 63–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034001003

Alexandre-Collier, A. (2016). The “Open Garden of Politics”: The impact of open primaries for candidate selection in the British Conservative Party. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(3), 706-723, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116636518

Bagby, W. S (1955) The "Smoke Filled Room" and the Nomination of Warren G. Harding, The Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 41(4), 657-674, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1889182

Budi, A. (2020): Less democracy, more centralism: the selection of

Candidates by Golkar and PDIP in Indonesian subnational executive elections, 2005–2020, Asian Journal of Political Science, https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2020.1774909

Bjarnegard, E & Kenny, M 2015, 'Revealing the secret garden: The informal dimensions of political recruitment', Politics & Gender, 11(4), 748-753, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X15000471

Croissant, A., & Chambers, P. (2010). Unravelling Intra-Party Democracy in Thailand. Asian Journal of Political Science, 18(2), 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2010.492990

Crouch, C. (2019). "Post-Democracy and Populism". The Political Quarterly. 90: 124–137. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12575

Deiss-Helbig, E.(2016), “Digging the ”secret garden of politics” An exploration of the role of formal and informal candidate selection processes regarding ethnic minority representation”, Paper prepared for the 44th ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Pisa, 24 – 28 April 2016

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/feef/74789ffa5fdd476b4a9da1605e6c174b7f4f.pdf

Detterbeck, K. (2016). Candidate Selection in Germany. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(7), 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216632822

Elgie, R. & Jones, E. (2000) Agents, Principals and the Study of Institutions: Constructing a Principal-Centered Account of Delegation. Working documents in the Study of European Governance Number: 5. Center for the Study of European Governance (CSEG)

Farell, H. (2018) The Shared Challenges of Institutional Theories: Rational Choice, Historical Institutionalism, and Sociological Institutionalism, in Knowledge and Institutions, J. Glückler, R. Suddaby, R. Lenz Eds. Berlin : Springer

Gallagher, M. and Marsh, M. (eds.) (1988) Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics, London: Sage

Hall, P. A. and Taylor, C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies 44 (5): 936-957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x

Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Decentralization and Democracy in Indonesia: A Critique of Neo-Institutionalist Perspectives. Development and Change, 35(4), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155x.2004.00376.x

Hazan, R. Y. & Rahat, G (2010). Democracy within Parties. Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Concequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572540.001.0001

Hazan, Reuven Y. & Rahat, G. (2006) ‘Candidate Selection’, in Richard Katz and William J. Crotty (eds), Handbook of Party Politics, (London : Sage)pp. 109–122; https://doi.org/10.4135/978-1-84860-804-7

Kelsall, T. (2002). Shop windows and smoke-filled rooms: governance and the re-politicisation of Tanzania. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 40(4), pp. 597-619. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3876027

Krook, M.L (2010) Beyond Supply and Demand : A Feminist-institutionalist Theory of Candidate Selection, Political Research Quarterly

(4) 707–720, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1065912909336275

Lowndes, V. & Roberts (2013) Why Institutions Matter The New Institutionalism in Political Science, New York : Palgrave Macmillan

McCutcheon, B. (1997). Do meetings in smoke-filled rooms facilitate collusion?. Journal of Political Economy, 105(2), 330-350. https://doi.org/10.1086/262075

Motz, N. (2019) Who emerges from smoke-filled rooms? Political parties and candidate selection. Soc Choice Welf. 52, pp.161–196; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-018-1147-z

North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Norris, P. (2006) “Recruitment,” in Richard S. Katz and William J. Crotty, eds., Handbook of Party Politics (London: Sage), pp 89–108. https://doi.org/10.4135/978-1-84860-804-7

Peters, B. G. (2004) Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’, (2nd edition); London: Continuum

Poteete, A. R., & Ostrom, E. (2004). Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management. Development and Change, 35(3), 435–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x

Power, T., & Warburton, E. (Eds.). (2020). Democracy in Indonesia: From stagnation to regression?. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.

Prianto, A. L. (2024). Political Party Governance as an Institutional Challenge to the Democratic Regression in Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Local Politics (JGLP), 6(1), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v6i1.1304

Prianto, A. L., & Yuslaini, N. (2024). How Local Democratic Backsliding? Single Candidate, Pragmatism And Uncompetitive Local Head Election In Indonesia. JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik), 9(2), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v9i2.53451

Prianto, A. L., Nurmandi, A., Qodir, Z., & Jubba, H. (2022). Does Collective Action Institutionalize Rational Choice? Candidate Selection In Indonesian Political Parties. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 8(3), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2283063p%20

Prianto, A. L., Malik, I., Rusnaedy, Z., Khaerah, N., Abdillah, A., Lestari, D., & Angraini, A. (2021). Demokrasi Lokal Dan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Pasangan Calon Tunggal; Makassar: Subaltern Inti Media.

Rahat, G. (2013). What is democratic candidate selection? In W. P. Cross, & R. Katz (Eds.), The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy, (Oxford : Oxford University Press), pp 136–149; https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199661879.001.0001

Siavelis, P. M., & Morgenstern, S. (2008). Candidate Recruitment and Selection in Latin America: A Framework for Analysis. Latin American Politics and Society, 50(04), 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00029.x

Seeberg, M. B; Wahman, M. & Skaaning, S.E (2018) Candidate nomination, intra-party democracy, and election violence in Africa, Democratization, 25: 6, 959-977, https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.1420057

Syafhendry; Prianto, Andi Luhur; Yuslaini, Nina. (2023). Political Part Preferences on Local Election in Indonesia: How Does Rational Choice Institutionalism Work in Candidate Selection?. J. Liberty & Int'l Aff., 9, 74. https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2393063h

Vicentini, G. (2018). Candidate selection methods and electoral performance in comparative perspective. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2018.9

Published
2025-05-16
Abstract viewed = 74 times
PDF downloaded = 103 times